Biomimicry is the practice of taking designs from nature
to apply to human technologies and systems.
The natural processes of our world have created ingenious designs -
everything from small bacteria, to human beings, to entire ecosystems have
aspects worth copying. As an example,
humpback whales have a series of bumps on their flippers that allow them to
spin very quickly underwater despite their large size. This design is being copied and applied to
windmills so that they spin faster and are able to harness more wind energy. Also, the human lung has a complex filtering
system designed to manage carbon dioxide intake. Scientists are trying to figure out how to
copy these properties and apply them to factory flue stacks to prevent CO2 from
escaping into the atmosphere.
One basic principle of nature is that diversity supports
survival, especially in disasters. The more
diverse an ecosystem the better that ecosystem will weather change. I believe this principle is also true within
the collective psyche of a large culture such as ours. Following the ideas of biomimicry we can think of our collective cultural psyche as an ecosystem. If there is large "psychological
diversity" people will have a wide variety of ideas. When presented with problems a culture with a
large pool of approaches will be able to find and follow through with novel
solutions. But if there is little
diversity with regard to how people view and live their lives the culture will
more likely remain stagnant when faced with issues.
I would argue that currently our cultural and social
systems are not emulating this principle.
Although we all share biological aspects of being human, the brain is
flexible enough so that each human can develop a very unique perspective and
way of being in life. But instead our
culture encourages us all to develop in essentially the same way. People develop differing political opinions,
beliefs about religion and spirituality, and different career paths. Opinions and viewpoints differ, but ways of
being in the world do not. For the most
part people all live their lives within a similar parameter. Everyone is brought through the same school
system taking the same classes - everyone is expected to try to find the
highest paying job they can so they can consume at least what average people
consume and hopefully more.
To an extent every cultural model will do this. Humans are social creatures born with a
biology that encourages them to copy the people they are surrounded by. Those in the in-group, the accepted members
of the "pack", have a better chance of survival when supported by
their fellow humans. No matter what the
nature of culture will draw humans to think, act, and be similarly.
The issue is that our modern culture is so pervasive that
humans all over the world are buying into it.
We eat different foods, listen to different music, have different
hobbies, and even speak different languages.
But we all essentially live the same way. We live to consume. We live to go to work then watch TV before we
go to bed and do the same things the next day.
Societies all organize themselves - organize the way human lives are
lived within them - the same way.
As we live through this routine every day we reinforce
the neural connections associated with it.
Our habitual ways of being become ingrained in our psyche. Our culture becomes less and less
psychologically diverse as our one way of being is repeatedly imprinted in the
minds of the people. But we live in an
age where we need as much psychological diversity as possible. We need as many perspectives as possible if
we have any chance of finding new ways of being which will solve our current
crises - environmental, social, political, financial, et cetera.
I can't say I have the solution to our losing
psychological diversity. I think a
good start would be making our culture more accepting of the wide variety of
individual perspectives and paths of growth that are possible. If more people's natural way of being were respected
and nurtured instead of being molded to fit the way of being of our culture
then we would grow more psychologically diverse as more people developed their
own unique approach to life. At this
point I believe any attempt to encourage different ways of living to emerge
would be worth trying. Hopefully we can
find better solutions to our problems as different approaches to life are taken
on.
No comments:
Post a Comment